Importance of Understanding Biological Basis of Behaviour

Importance of apprehensiveness Biological Basis of deportmentThis essay will first of all attempt to briefly advert between nigh of the bases of discernment behaviour. Next, the biologic approach will be elaborated and this will be followed by a succinct military rank of the strengths and criticisms of this approach.Behaviour can be silent from different bases (approaches). Among these include Behaviourist, Cognitive, Psychodynamic, humane and Biological approaches (Glassman and Hadad, 2013). The behavioural approach assumes that behaviour is created or modified by environmental factors, irrespective of the mind (Chance, 2013). Vice versa, sagaciousness behaviour from a cognitive posterior involves the musing of internal events (mediators) between a input signal and behaviour. Contrary to the biological approach, these internal events atomic number 18 conceptual rather than physiologic (Gardner, 2008). Similarly, the psychodynamic approach assumes that behaviour is sha ped by internal mental shapees. On the contrary, it focuses on the motivation of behaviour (intentionality). Such motivation influences personality and thereby influences behaviour (Glassman, Glassman and Hadad, 2008). From a humanistic perspective, behaviour is understood from an individuals subjective experiences (phenomenological viewpoint), a free will of individuals to be cast off which is not influenced by immediate or past stimuli (the capacity of choice) and the value individuals place on their experiences and actions (the use of goods and services of meaning) (Fernald, 2008).In the biological approach, behaviour is as egress of neurological, contagious and physiological processes. The spirit and the central nervous system play a key role in determining behaviour. Changes in the growth of the brain are genetically determined and result in psychological and behavioural development. A well-functioning nervous system depicts normal behaviour. Abnormal behaviour is commonl y characterised by bodily (organic) or genetic disorders, chemical imbalances, brain detriment or mental illness. Consequently, the modes of treatment include the use of drugs, psychosurgery and electroconvulsive therapy. These are apply to treat the underlying causes of the illness or to relieve symptoms (Sanders, 2014).There are various strengths in understanding behaviour from a biological basis (approach). The biological basis of understanding behaviour has improved our understanding of behaviour. It has successfully proved the impact of genetic factors in explaining behaviour (including individual differences) such as intelligence and some mental disorders. For example, twin studies have shown that behaviour such as susceptibility to mental disorders (Posthuma and Polderman, 2013) and intelligence (Frani et al, 2014) is shaped by genetic factors. The biological approach to understanding behaviour often takes a reductionist approach. Hence, various experimental studies have p rovided useful results in understanding behaviour. For example, physiological and genetic studies have contributed immensely to our understanding of sleep (Wyatt et al, 1999, Allebrandt et al, 2011, Dauvilliers, Maret and Tafti, 2005).Understanding behaviour from a biological basis has been usefully applied in psychopathology. It has been beneficial in the use of chemotherapy to treat mental disorders such as depression, anxiety and schizophrenia (Rockstroh, 2001). Genetic counselling for couples is as a result of our understanding of the relation that exists between genes and behaviour. This could be of great relief for some couples who carry a gene that makes their children susceptible to a fatal complaint (Harper, 2010). It is also believed that understanding behaviour in its biological context could protagonist in generalisations between animals and humans (Larsson, 2003).Despite these strengths, the biological basis of understanding behaviour faces some criticisms. It is argu ed that a thorough understanding of behaviour cannot be established from studying only biological factors. Social, cultural and psychological factors have also been shown to have an influence on behaviour. It has therefore been criticised for not including these factors in explaining behaviour (Glassman and Hadad, 2013). Furthermore, some have stressed that behaviour is a process and not a substance as portrayed in the biological approach (Greenberg, 2011, Overton, 2006). From a biological perspective, there is great emphasis of the role of genetic factors in shaping behaviour. However, this relation has been shown to be indirect and understood poorly. For example, a twin study by Plomin et al. (1990) found that television ceremonial is influenced by genetic factors, but it is unclear how genes cause such effect.In conclusion, understanding behaviour from only a biological basis seems inadequate. This calls for consideration of other approaches to address its limitations.Total word count 699ReferencesAllebrandt, K., Amin, N., Mller-Myhsok, B., Esko, T., Teder-Laving, M., Azevedo, R., Hayward, C., new wave Mill, J., Vogelzangs, N. and Green, E. (2011) A KATP channel gene effect on sleep succession from genome-wide association studies to function in Drosophila. Molecular Psychiatry online. 18 (1), pp.122-132. Accessed 16 October 2014Chance, P. (2013) Learning and Behavior. Cengage Learning.Dauvilliers, Y., Maret, S. and Tafti, M. (2005) Genetics of normal and pathological sleep in humans. remainder Medicine Reviews online. 9 (2), pp.91-100. Accessed 14 October 2014Fernald, L.D. (2008) Psychology Six Perspectives. Los Angeles Sage Publications.Frani, S., Dolan, C.V., caravan Beijsterveldt, C.E., Pol, H.E.H., Bartels, M. and Boomsma, D.I. (2014) Genetic and Environmental Stability of Intelligence in clawhood and Adolescence. pair Research and Human Genetics online. 17 (03), pp.151-163. Accessed 19 October 2014Gardner, H. (2008) The Minds New apprehension A History of the Cognitive Revolution. Basic books.Glassman, W., Glassman, W.E. and Hadad, M. (2008) Approaches to Psychology. McGraw-Hill International.Glassman, W.E. and Hadad, M. (2013) Approaches to Psychology. capital of the United Kingdom McGraw-Hill Higher Education.Greenberg, G. (2011) The blow of biogenetic analysis in psychology Why psychology is not a biological science. Research in Human Development online. 8 (3-4), pp.173-191. Accessed 14 October 2014Harper, P.S. (2010) Practical Genetic Counselling. Hodder Arnold London.Larsson, K. (2003) My way to biological psychology. Scandinavian journal of Psychology online. 44 (3), pp.173-187. Accessed 25 October 2014Overton, W.F. (2006) Developmental psychology Philosophy, concepts, methodology. Handbook of Child Psychology.Plomin, R., Corley, R., DeFries, J.C. and Fulker, D.W. (1990) Individual differences in television viewing in early childishness Nature as well as nurture. Psychological Science online. 1 (6), pp.371-377. Ac cessed 29 October 2014Posthuma, D. and Polderman, T.J. (2013) What have we learned from recent twin studies about the etiology of neurodevelopmental disorders? Current Opinion in Neurology online. 26 (2), pp.111-121. Accessed 30 October 2014Rockstroh, B. (2001) Contributions of biological psychology to psychopathology. Biological Psychology online. 57 (1), pp.1-4. Accessed 20 October 2014Sanders, R.L. (2014) Biological Psychology. London Learning Matters.Wyatt, J.K., Ritz-De Cecco, A., Czeisler, C.A. and Dijk, D.J. (1999) Circadian temperature and melatonin rhythms, sleep, and neurobehavioral function in humans living on a 20-h day. The American Journal of Physiology online. 277 (4 Pt 2), pp.R1152-63. Accessed 30 October 20141